|
Post by Zytes on Mar 7, 2022 7:40:26 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by olderguysrule on Mar 7, 2022 9:46:11 GMT -8
^^ Maybe Haas needs a Penske rental shipping sticker on their card.
|
|
|
Post by pushtopass on Mar 7, 2022 11:34:50 GMT -8
Put on some flow-viz and dangle the car out the airplane to make up for lost track work.
|
|
|
Post by Carlo_Carrera on Mar 9, 2022 16:57:30 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Carlo_Carrera on Mar 9, 2022 16:58:53 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Carlo_Carrera on Mar 10, 2022 4:31:56 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Carlo_Carrera on Mar 10, 2022 4:34:09 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by pushtopass on Mar 10, 2022 5:17:14 GMT -8
Just watching a bit on F1TV and damn, the Ferrari looks really cool with it's DRS open
|
|
|
Post by Carlo_Carrera on Mar 10, 2022 5:44:06 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Carlo_Carrera on Mar 10, 2022 5:49:45 GMT -8
Haas on track.
|
|
|
Post by Carlo_Carrera on Mar 10, 2022 5:59:49 GMT -8
Mercedes W13 Extreme Porpoising
|
|
|
Post by Red_Hercules on Mar 10, 2022 6:16:50 GMT -8
That didn't tell me anything. Basically it's all about side-impact, right? Everything else I read says that in terms of airflow, shape, minimums and maximums, etc., there is nothing wrong with the design. So if the design passes side-impact tests what does it matter what it looks like? Mercedes had to design to their own needs. If the design meets the basic requirements of the regulations, how does anything else matter? Bravo to Mercedes for coming up with something different. (Interesting of course that there are already so many articles comparing the design to eras past.)
|
|
|
Post by Carlo_Carrera on Mar 10, 2022 6:35:48 GMT -8
That didn't tell me anything. Basically it's all about side-impact, right? Everything else I read says that in terms of airflow, shape, minimums and maximums, etc., there is nothing wrong with the design. So if the design passes side-impact tests what does it matter what it looks like? Mercedes had to design to their own needs. If the design meets the basic requirements of the regulations, how does anything else matter? Bravo to Mercedes for coming up with something different. (Interesting of course that there are already so many articles comparing the design to eras past.) I think you missed the whole point of the article. It's basically saying that there is nothing glaringly illegal in the Mercedes design. There are a few winglet things that are definite gray areas. The other teams in the FIA will have to sort that out.
|
|
|
Post by Carlo_Carrera on Mar 10, 2022 6:53:08 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Carlo_Carrera on Mar 10, 2022 6:58:12 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Red_Hercules on Mar 10, 2022 7:00:52 GMT -8
That didn't tell me anything. Basically it's all about side-impact, right? Everything else I read says that in terms of airflow, shape, minimums and maximums, etc., there is nothing wrong with the design. So if the design passes side-impact tests what does it matter what it looks like? Mercedes had to design to their own needs. If the design meets the basic requirements of the regulations, how does anything else matter? Bravo to Mercedes for coming up with something different. (Interesting of course that there are already so many articles comparing the design to eras past.) I think you missed the whole point of the article. It's basically saying that there is nothing glaringly illegal in the Mercedes design. There are a few winglet things that are definite gray areas. The other teams in the FIA will have to sort that out. Are you daft? That's what I said: And where did I get that? From the article I just read. Are you dense just to be dense or where you born that way?
|
|
|
Post by Carlo_Carrera on Mar 10, 2022 7:03:22 GMT -8
I think you missed the whole point of the article. It's basically saying that there is nothing glaringly illegal in the Mercedes design. There are a few winglet things that are definite gray areas. The other teams in the FIA will have to sort that out. Are you daft? That's what I said: And where did I get that? From the article I just read. Are you dense just to be dense or where you born that way? Dude, what is your problem? Lighten up.
|
|
|
Post by Carlo_Carrera on Mar 10, 2022 7:03:30 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Red_Hercules on Mar 10, 2022 7:07:33 GMT -8
Are you daft? That's what I said: And where did I get that? From the article I just read. Are you dense just to be dense or where you born that way? Dude, what is your problem? Lighten up. You're a fucking admin. You need to act like a human being, and not like an asshole all the time.
|
|
|
Post by Carlo_Carrera on Mar 10, 2022 7:13:56 GMT -8
Dude, what is your problem? Lighten up. You're a fucking admin. You need to act like a human being, and not like an asshole all the time. What is your problem? You made this statement: That didn't tell me anything.... I replied by saying the article says there is nothing glaringly illegal with the design. That is what it is telling you with regards to the rules. What is wrong/offensive with that?
|
|