jmjgt
Member
Posts: 3,311
|
Post by jmjgt on Mar 11, 2021 14:59:25 GMT -8
When Red Bull first did it the media speculated that it had to do with the air 'sticking' to the car instead of sliding thru it with the slicker paints, I have no clue if that's really true or if it's even enough to matter since the cars aren't going in a straight line 90% of the time anyway. The problem with alot of wind tunnels is the air only blows straight on to the car so what looks good on paper may not work once the car is repositioned or moving. When they are turning the wind still hits the nose first and, other than the small slip angle, the air basically hits the car straight on. The wind is a different matter. Or am I incorrect on this? I view these cars as going at a much higher forward velocity relative to the turning radius and slip angle such that the primary aim movement direction along the car wouldn't change by more than a few degrees. Unless there's a breeze, wind or convection moving it the "air" doesn't do anything until the car moves though it and pushes it around. The basic difference between the wind tunnel and what actually happens when the car move through the atmosphere is the air in the tunnel has added kinetic energy while the static air must first be move from it resting place or convinced to be redirected from the path it's already flowing. It a car is sliding though a turn it's no longer hitting the atmosphere head on, there's a bit of sideways slip effecting the way it passes though the air. As for the flat paint there is some science about boundary layers and all that but i doubt there's enough surface reaction to make a huge difference, and the 5 or so pounds of clear coat and the time and expense it take to apply it are better utilized somewhere else.
|
|
|
Post by Carlo_Carrera on Mar 11, 2021 16:03:59 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by thirddegree on Mar 26, 2021 12:25:17 GMT -8
i remember the 90's when some of the best looking cars had to pre-qualify. I enjoyed pre-qualifying.
|
|